







|

In some circumstances,
Polymer Gels can be used successfully as an alternative to cement, or
in combination with cement, to squeeze casing leaks. A number of processes
have been developed for this application. The type of polymer, and the
process used depends on the location and severity of the leak, and whether
or not the squeeze will be required to hold a solid pressure, or simply
block the encroachment of foreign water in a producing well. The advantage
of using polymer in these applications is two-fold. Polymer can be washed
out of the wellbore after a leak is squeezed, preventing the costly rig
time involved in drilling out cement. Secondly, since polymer solution
exerts a much lower hydrostatic weight than a cement slurry, there is
less possibility of breaking down the formation and losing the squeeze.
On difficult leaks, such as the salt section, where multiple cement jobs
are often attempted before the leak is successfully squeezed off, a small
slug of polymer can be run ahead of the cement as a buffer to prevent
the cement from "running away" or washing out the section you are trying
to squeeze. Since the polymer continues to adsorb or bond to the formation,
and the bulk gel fills the larger voids, it is often enough to slow down
the coasting of the cement, and give it something to squeeze against.
Four basic
Polymer Gel Systems are in use today in casing leak squeeze operations,
as follows:

This non-toxic
system is most effective on tight casing leaks and pressure leak-off situations
such as leaks which bleed-off pressure but cannot be pumped into. This
system pumps as a water-thin fluid, then sets up into a tough, ringing
gel. Gel times can be controlled from 10 minutes to 2 hours, depending
on temperature. Treatment sizes typically range form 10-25 bbl. This is
an excellent application for disposal and injection wells which fail MIT's
because of slight pressure leakoff.
(High
Concentration Low Molecular Weight Polymer) This system is
useful for a variety of leaks ranging from tight pressure leakoff situations,
to moderate leaks which can be pumped into under pressure. This system
can be crosslinked using standard metallic crosslinkers, or a low-toxicity
organic crosslinking system can be used in environmentally sensitive areas,
or leak intervals.

(High Molecular Weight Polymers)
This
system is most effective in larger leaks in producing wells, to correct
channeling behind pipe, and for some list circulation applications. The
primary benefit of using this system is the ability to economically block
the flow of foreign water into the wellbore, or block the outflow of produced
fluids to thief zones. This system is most effective to block foreign
water encroachment in producing wells.

(Cement / Polymer Combination Squeeze)
Severe casing leaks which require mechanical integrity and are
unlikely to be successfully sealed using either cement or polymer alone
are candidates for this process. In most cases, a small (25-50 bbl) slug
of High Molecular Weight Crosslinked Polymer is injected ahead of 50-100sx
Cement. In this application the polymer acts as a filler/buffer, filling
larger voids and coating formation surfaces, preventing water loss and
cement contamination by formation fluids. The polymer also acts as a pad,
holding the cement in the near wellbore area, where it is most effective.
This process blocks the foreign water away from the wellbore, and allows
pressure integrity to be obtained more cost-effectively than would be
possible with cement alone or polymer alone.

|